The purpose of this article is to set in motion a
train of thought designed to overthrow the unfortunate misconceptions about the
character of God which have palsied the spiritual outreach of men since the
emergence of sin.
It lays down some principles which are very basic to a grasp
of this subject but it does not specifically answer the many questions which
will be raised.
A much larger work entitled Behold Your God gives a
comprehensive coverage of this vast and saving subject. It answers the many
questions left untouched in this publication.
The study of the character of God as revealed in the life and
teachings of Christ and, in fact, through the whole of the Scriptures, is a
study of the highest possible value. Rightly understood, it is the key to
May every reader of these pages, under the ministry of the
Holy Spirit, be delivered from the thoughts of wayward man to think and to speak
the words of God.
Thinking as a Man
For days the rain poured down in steady torrents. The
old earth dam was thirty-five years old. The water, brown and swirling, reached
almost to its crest. Still the rain continued.
In the river valley below, the residents went about their
business, wishing the rain would end but paying little attention beyond that.
Then it happened.
The earth walls trembled beneath the mounting pressure of
manifold tons of water, cracked, then exploded outwards, releasing a surging
thirty-foot wall of roaring, foaming, savage destruction which raced at express
train speed upon all that stood in its path.
When its brief fury was spent, thirty-nine people were dead
and forty-five seriously injured. Buildings and vehicles were savaged into
Naturally, the insurance companies described the tragedy as
an "act of God." Of course, they thought as men.
Above the steaming jungles of a south-sea island, a great
volcano raised its mighty crown. Of late, it had rumbled and smoked, causing the
villagers to regard it with increasing apprehension. Then came the day when
mighty explosions rent the air. Boiling lava flowed over the side and advanced
inexorably on the villages below. Houses were consumed in the flames, crops were
wiped out, and stock losses were heavy. The villagers themselves fled for their
lives, finally taking to the steaming sea in canoes.
With sober and awed faces they told one another that God was
angry with them and they must work out some method of appeasing Him.
This is to think as a man.
A person who had always enjoyed wonderful health, became seriously
ill. Confined to a bed of suffering and pain in the hospital, his thoughts
turned to God for comfort. He took up a bedside Bible and, opening it for the
first time in his life, began to read at the beginning.
Passing beyond the Genesis record of creation and the fall of
Adam, he came to the story of the flood where he read that God sent the waters
on the earth to destroy those who would not obey Him. Then he read of the
outpouring of fire on Sodom and Gomorrah, the plagues rained upon Egypt, and the
commands from God to the Israelites to go out and destroy the Amalekites down to
the tender infant in arms.
It was too much. He closed the book declaring that he could
neither love nor serve a God who could manifest such cruelty as he saw pictured
in those words.
How sad indeed that he read it all through the eyes of human
understanding. He saw God behaving as if He were a man.
Ever more frequently, disasters are destroying life and property
around the world. Always it is regarded as being the work of a God who is
venting His wrath on a people who will not obey, respect, and love Him.
This is to attribute human behaviour to God.
This is not to speak as God speaks nor to think as He thinks. No
one will ever love and serve God while he thinks of Him in the limited,
superficial way of man. The very facts of life prove this. Humans are so settled
in the idea that an angry God is sending all these troubles on the earth that
they do not question the notion. They believe that He does this to correct their
disobedience, but it does not produce such a result. The more they are subjected
to such treatment, the less they love God and the more rebelliously they pursue
their own ways.
This is the natural outcome. Look and see if any earthly
potentate ever won the love and loyalty of his subjects by inflicting upon them
heavy punishments for disobedience. He may have obtained a craven service, but
this is not the loyalty of love. Therefore, if God uses the tactics which men
believe He does, then it is a self-defeating program. Instead of gaining loving
and cheerful obedience, He is rewarded at best with a servile loyalty and, at
worst, with open and flagrant rebellion.
Another Way to Think
There is another altogether different, inspiringly
beautiful, and refreshingly pleasant way to think of God. It is the way of
Christ. The time surely has come when men need to speak of God, not as a man, but
as Christ did. When men learn to speak of God as Christ did, then love, joy,
admiration, loyalty, and peace will spring forth naturally from the human heart.
Then, God will truly be seen as a loving Father, not as a despotic
When Christ came to this earth, He had a number of missions
to accomplish. One of the most important of these was to expose the lie in
circulation regarding His Father's wonderful character and to show the Father as
He truly is. He invites all to see, to think and to speak of God as He sees,
thinks and speaks of Him, not as men do.
Christ revealed the Father so fully that all that men can know or
need to know about Him has been revealed in the life and character of His Son.
Yet despite the magnificent level of perfection to which Christ did this work,
this aspect of His divine ministry remains little known and recognized even to
this day. Not even the apostles of Christ awakened to it. It is for this reason
that Philip said:
"Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us."
Christ was greatly disappointed by this request. Well He
might be, for it told Him that the purpose of His mission remained undiscerned
by the ones nearest to Him-the ones who should have seen this the first and the
"Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with
you, and yet hast thou not known Me, Philip? he that hath seen Me hath seen the
Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?" John 14:8, 9.
Christ affirmed that if they had seen Him and His wonderful
character of love, then they had seen the Father. This is to assert, quite
truthfully, that Christ had not merely come to declare the Father. He had also
come to reveal or to manifest Him. To do the latter or even the former
effectively, He must in Himself be a perfect and complete reproduction of the
Father. This He indeed was.
Quite some time before this conversation with Philip took
place, He had already informed them that His life was the perfect reflection of
the Father's and that He did only what the Father did.
"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily,
I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of Himself, but what He seeth the Father
do: for what things soever He doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise. For the
Father loveth the Son, and sheweth Him all things that Himself doeth: and He
will shew Him greater works than these, that ye may marvel." John 5:19,
The essential point in this declaration from Him who said of
Himself, "I am the truth," John 14:6, is that not only did
Christ do only the things which the Father did, but He did them likewise, or
exactly as the Father did them. The methods, the principles of operation, the
procedures of the One, are precisely and completely those of the Other.
Many have read the records of the Old Testament and have seen
God as a wrathful, vengeful being who thought nothing of pouring molten fire
down on the helpless heads of those who would not repent, the Sodomites being a
case in point. Then they have read the story of Christ and, seeing a being very
different from the God they saw in the Old Testament, have concluded that
the characters of God and Christ are different. They see Christ as being gentle,
loving, kind, forgiving, humble, and patient and as One who never once
retaliated against His enemies. Irrespective of how brutally they treated Him,
how unkindly they rejected Him, how mercilessly they harassed Him, and how
shamelessly they lied about Him, He only responded by doing good to them in
return. Though invited to destroy His rejectors, He never once lifted a finger
to do so.
To say that the Father and the Son have different characters
is to speak as a man for this is not the way Christ spoke. With absolute
finality and authority, He confirmed that He and His Father were of the same
character and did the same works in the same way.
Those who see as Christ saw and speak as He speaks, know and
speak the truth. They no longer think as men. They discard all the views once
held which conflict with the testimony of Jesus. It means that what they thought
they saw God doing in the Old Testament, must be exchanged for another and
different view, the new one coinciding with the revelation of God as given by
His Son during His earthly ministry. In reality, it is to say that the life and
teachings of Christ are the measure by which every notion about God must be
tested. Any view of God the Father, no matter how logical or long-standing it
may be, which in any way differs from the ways of Christ, is to be discarded as
error. This must be done even though at first it is impossible to see where it
actually is in error. Those who do this will assuredly have correct views of the
character and ways of God. This will, in turn, bring blessing and benefit beyond
In this brief paper it is impossible to explore every
erroneous idea about the character of God which has been drawn from the Old
Testament, but space will be devoted to one such experience.
For centuries, Israel had been in Egyptian captivity when
God, from the burning bush, at last called Moses to go and lead the people to
the promised land. Very explicit were the instructions given to the leader.
"And the Lord said unto Moses, See I have made thee a
God to Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. Thou shalt speak all
that I command thee: and Aaron thy brother shall speak unto Pharaoh, that he
send the children of Israel out of his land. And I will harden Pharaoh's heart,
and multiply My signs and My wonders in the land of Egypt. But Pharaoh shall not
hearken unto you, that I may lay My hand upon Egypt, and bring forth Mine
armies, and My people the children of Israel, out of the land of Egypt by great
judgments. And the Egyptians shall know that I am the Lord, when I stretch forth
Mine hand upon Egypt, and bring out the children of Israel from among
them." Exodus 7:1-5.
The story continues with Moses and Aaron going in before the
king, demanding the release of the Israelites, Pharaoh's flat refusal followed
by devastating plague after plague, until, battered and beaten, the king was
glad to let them go. It is a familiar history.
Men have come to their own conclusions about how God
performed in this drama. This is how men, who think like men, have seen
God was the all-powerful ruler of the universe. The time came
when He decided that the Israelites should be released. Accordingly, in a tone
of authority, He ordered Moses to command the king to free them with the threat
of direct reprisals should he refuse.
The monarch did refuse, whereupon God struck him hard by
turning the Nile and the waters throughout the land into undrinkable blood. Then
God paused, to give the defiant ruler time to acquiesce. When he refused to
obey, the Lord struck him again. With each repeated and rebellious refusal, God
struck him until in the end he was literally battered into submission and had no
choice but to release them.
This is the way in which men generally understand God to have
conducted His affairs in that situation. Compare this view of God with another
In certain cities of the world, such as Chicago, U.S.A.,
there are powerful criminal organizations which look upon themselves as being
the true governors of the metropolis. They decide that they want specific
"payments" from a given businessman. Accordingly they go to him and
announce their demands, intimating that they are the effective power in the
area, and making it clear that if he refuses to comply, they will hit him hard.
The man, either because he has principle or has not yet learned the power of the
"bosses," refuses. Whereupon they hit him with a vengeance. They might
blow up his car, smash his shop windows, or something worse. Then they give him
time to reconsider. Should he persist in his refusal, they will hit him again
and again, until he is finally battered into submission. Not only does the
syndicate gain what they wanted from this man, but the incident supplies an
opportunity of demonstrating their power, thus providing an example of this man
calculated to intimidate other business people in the city.
These methods, it is found, work rather effectively. But the
obedience obtained does not emanate from love and appreciation of the gangland
chiefs. Rather, they are hated and despised for their methods and obeyed only
because there is no other choice.
The Crucial Question
This question now arises: What difference is there between
the methods of the criminal chiefs and those which God is supposed to
have used in the land of Egypt? Be careful to see exactly what the question is.
It is concerned with the methods used by the one and attributed to the
other. It is not asking about motives or character but about procedures.
The answer has to be that there is no difference whatsoever. If the
common understanding of God's behaviour in Egypt is retained, then it follows
that the ways of God, and those who live by robbery and oppression, are
When I put this proposition to a very well-educated person,
he quickly replied that the methods used by God were indeed the same as the
syndicate but that God's intention was different. In other words, whereas
the bosses used these tactics to further their own selfish ends, the Lord did it
all for others. This is to argue that the end justifies the means, that
the methods used by the criminals were unjustified because they were done from
selfish motivations, while God's use of the same procedures was justified
because He did it from a righteous motive.
But the Scriptures do not support this reasoning. God
personally denies that His ways are the same as man's ways. He assures us that
they are quite different. Here are His words:
"For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your
ways My ways, saith the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so
are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts."
isaiah 55:8, 9.
What God said in these verses is the truth but only if the
view of God described above is not the truth. If God did in Egypt what He is
understood to have done, then His ways are no different from those of the very
worst of men, and He has made Himself a liar by saying what He said in this
reference. But God is no liar. He is the truth and speaks only the truth, by
which we are to know that another and different understanding of His behaviour
in Egypt is called for.
Not only does this Old Testament witness call for such a
revision. The life of Christ, who did only what the Father did, exactly as He
did it, denies utterly the popular version of God's doings in Egypt. Nowhere in
the entire lifetime of Christ do we find Him using such methods to secure the
desired results. It is impossible to find a single instance for it does not
exist. Yet, in the light of the testimony of our wonderful Saviour who declared
that He did only what the Father did, and as He did it, it is incumbent upon
those who choose to continue to believe that God acted in Egypt as an oppressor
who gained His ends by the use of force, to find a situation where Christ gained
His ends in the same way.
This cannot be done. About the only incident which can be
construed in this fashion is the cleansing of the temple. Some will argue that
Christ threatened the money changers with the whip, but it will be shown that to
argue this way is to speak as a man and not as Christ. What Christ really did
will become clear when it is seen what God actually did in Egypt.
Since the witness of Jesus lends no support to the popular
view of God's behaviour in Egypt, and since God Himself has testified that His
ways are not the ways of men, another view of God's actions in Egypt must be
found; a view that is strictly Scriptural and in perfect harmony with the
witness of Jesus. It must speak, not as a man, but as Christ.
The Scriptures of truth testify that "God is love."
1 John 4:8.
Something of the full force of this Scripture can be
appreciated only when it is seen that it does not merely say that God loves,
even though this is true, but that He is love. It is because He is love
that He loves. Because God is infinite, boundless, endless, and unlimited, His
love is the same. It is infinite. This means that there is no point where the
boundary or the limit of that love can be found. Therefore, it is written of Him
that with Him there "Is no variableness, neither shadow of turning." James
Human love is finite or limited. We love so long as we are
loved and then our love begins to fade away. It may and often does come to the
place where the intensity of our love is changed to an equal fury of hatred. In
this, the way of God is also different from man's way. No matter how much we may
reject God, despise Him, war against Him, insult Him, or separate from Him, His
love to us is not changed in the least degree.
One great difference between divine and human love is that
God loves, not because of what we are, but because of what He is, whereas
people love, not because of what they are, but because of what the person they
love is. This mould is placed on humans from their earliest days when parents
convey to the children the idea that if they are good, father and mother
will love them, but if they are naughty, then that love will be
withdrawn. The child quickly absorbs the idea and practices it in all his
relationships with other children. If the behaviour of a certain child conforms
to his standards and desires, then love is returned, but if the child does not
do as he is required, then love is withdrawn. The only factor governing the
whole procedure is the livability of the other person, not the capacity of the
first person to love regardless of what the other is.
The same attitude and practice attends entrance into
adulthood and marriage. Those who can be loved because of what they are, are
sought out, while the others are shut out. The sought-out become the shut-out
should they change in their ways to a pattern which no longer meets the needs
and desires of the lover.
Because men tend to judge God by their own experiences and
make Him to be altogether such an one as themselves (see Psalm 50:21), He
likewise is seen as One who loves us only while we are lovably obedient
to His every requirement. But the fact remains that no matter how disobedient
and unlovely we may become, this makes no difference to His love toward us. It
does, of course, make a difference to the accessibility of that love, for the
very act of disobedience is an act of separation on our part. But this departure
by us must not be confused as being a withdrawal of love on His part.
Infinite love is infinite unselfishness. It is entirely and
only outgoing. Therefore when the Lord made the heavens and the earth, He did
not do it for Himself. He did it for the creatures whom He made. He did it for
you, for me, and for every other person who has ever lived. Consider then, the
needs which were created when the Lord contemplated bringing into existence all
When God planned to present the human family with the
love-gift of life, He recognized that this was not enough. Imagine being given
life, but no home, then being left to drift eternally through the empty, cold
blackness of infinite space with nothing to see, no one to communicate with, and
nothing to do. Would not non-existence be preferable? This would be a living
death in the worst form.
Therefore, God, in His infinite love and wisdom, purposed to
create first of all the love-gift of a perfect home. This He did on those first
days of creation week. But, even this was not enough, for the earth could not be
a satisfactory home providing infinite possibilities for development and
achievement, unless it was equipped with the necessary powers. The powers
referred to are those both outside of man and those within him. A full list is
not necessary here. All we need is a few examples to illustrate the point.
Within man are physical, muscular, intellectual, and
spiritual powers. Outside are the mighty forces in nature, such as electricity,
the sun, gravitation, and a thousand more.
The provision of power created a problem for although it was
given only for the purpose of blessing and happiness, it contained the cruel
potential for fearful destruction. This is the very nature of power. It is
impossible for it to exist without its having the ability to bless or to
destroy. This is a self-evident truth, which is demonstrated every day.
Infinite wisdom could not overlook the problem, and infinite
love would not leave it unsolved. One course open to God was to program the
human mind so that it would automatically choose only the right course. If this
was the best that the mind of God could conceive, then this is the way it would
have been. But to adopt these measures to protect the human family against the
misuse of power, would have meant the deprivation of the ability to choose and
therefore of the power to think. It would have limited, contained, and prevented
the highest and richest fulfilments of their desires and ambitions. It would
have restricted them to less than the level of the animal kingdom.
If God had given man the opportunity of selecting a solution,
this is not the one he would have chosen. Today, men would rather die than live
in bondage. More than one organization has adopted the slogan, "Freedom or
A solution had to be found which would provide perfect
protection from any dangerous use of power and yet, in no way deny man the
freedom to choose and to think. This required the formulation of perfect laws
covering every possible aspect of man's physical, mental, moral, material,
scientific, and spiritual existence. Neither the first parents nor any of their
children had either the power or wisdom to solve this problem by supplying the
need. God, of course, did. In His infinite wisdom and love, He delighted to give
such a complete and blessed gift as the laws of His kingdom.
It is a tragedy of the gravest proportions that men only
partly see the law as God designed it to be. Those areas of the law which deal
with man's relationship to his fellow-men and to God are regarded by most people
as being a device in- vented by God to enforce worship of, and to Him. Nothing
could be further from the truth, nor more depriving to God's created subjects.
While such views are maintained, either through sheer ignorance of the real
truth or by a stubborn resistance to the light, the true character of God cannot
be seen, nor can real fellowship with Him be obtained. Therefore, the full
achievement of God's intended purpose for man's ultimate fulfilment and
happiness must find its beginnings in the correction of these distorted ideas.
Curiously, and as usual, the concepts held are an interesting
mixture of truth and error. There is a ready willingness to recognize and
utilize law in the natural and, especially, the scientific field. Research
millions are expended annually by universities, governments, and business houses
in the quest to better understand and capitalize on the powers in the universe
according to law. Students under training for various professions are drilled on
the strict importance of obeying law in carrying out their intended professions.
Consider, for instance, the seemingly endless regulations with which an airline
captain must comply. Breaches swiftly attract severe disciplinary action or
prompt dismissal. Airline operations are conducted thus because the authorities
are acutely aware that obedience to the law is their life protector and
preserver. They know this and have no quarrel with it.
Tragically, while there is a willingness to recognize the
immense and indispensable value of scientific laws, there is a failure to
connect these laws with the Life-Giver. Man sees them simply as something which
has evolved out of nothing, but which will elevate his standard of living to the
highest and give him the power to put fear into his enemies. This deficiency of
understanding incurs immense losses, for God is not only the Law-Giver. He is
also the great Teacher who longs to initiate His children into the deepest and
broadest understandings of these things. "The fear of the Lord is the
beginning of wisdom." Proverbs 9:10. He is infinite in knowledge and
wisdom which He is ready to impart to all who will receive His instructions. If
mankind today would only learn of Him instead of trying to gain all knowledge
through their own powers, they would be vastly more advanced and benefited than
they presently are.
But, when it comes to moral law, man's attitude is
deplorable. He shows himself all too willing to restrain others while he excuses
himself from the same obligations. Men reveal by their actions that they want a
law which will protect them from other men, but not one which will protect other
men from them. But the law is designed to provide every man with the same
impartial and perfect protection. It never favours the one in advance of the
There is not a single commandment made by God for His own
exaltation, interest, or blessing. To some this may seem unbelievable, but it is
the truth. The human mind operates on the principle that the possession of great
power is the opportunity to enjoy freedom at the expense of others. Therefore,
it is concluded that, inasmuch as God has infinite power, He uses it to exalt
Himself and satisfy His own ambitious desires.
But God is not man. His ways are opposite from the dwellers
on this earth who have departed from His thoughts and ways.
Consider the first commandment. "Thou shalt have no
other gods before Me." How readily this is interpreted to be an order from
God ensuring that His position is fully reverenced so that He is accorded the
respect and worship He regards as being His due. The command is seen as being
made for God's benefit and not for manís.
But this is not so. That stipulation is for the created being
alone. God does not need it, nor does selfless love even think of protecting
itself. A moment's thought quickly shows how much we need to keep that command
God is the Creator of the heavens and the earth. But this is
not all. Moment by moment, He personally guides and sustains all these mighty
orbs and powers in their correct courses providing them with the energy to
continue. He alone can do this. Should any other being replace God, then, with
the source of life and energy being dried up, destruction would be the only
The sun, for instance, is a mighty power plant which has to
be continually energized by God for it cannot of itself be infinitely
self-sustaining. Life on this planet would become extinct should the sun cease
to perform its orderly functions. Therefore, it is vitally important that God
should not be displaced from His position in command of the sun. Some will
object that we do not have the power to remove God from this role. It is true
that we do not have it physically, but there is a way whereby human beings can
displace Him. It can be done because God will never force His presence where it
is not desired.
When men show by stubborn rebellion that they feel no need of
God and therefore desire Him to leave them to manage their own affairs, God does
not argue with them. He accepts their insistent demands and leaves them as
requested. The rejectors of His love and mercy then find themselves in the midst
of powers which have passed out of God's control.
Consider what this would mean in respect to the sun alone.
Exactly what would happen we do not know but we can picture the various
possibilities without finding one which would permit our survival. It could
simply fade out, or explode. It might veer off into outer space or plunge into a
collision with the earth. Whatever way it happened, the earth would cease to
support life of any kind.
There has not yet been a situation where every single human
being has taken such a stand against God, except in limited areas. Sodom and
Gomorrah were cities where it did happen and the same situation developed in
Through the life of Joseph, the eyes of the Egyptians had
been opened to behold the love and power of God working for their salvation. The
mighty ruler had obeyed God's instructions given through the young man, and
Egypt became the most powerful nation on earth. But prosperity brought apostasy,
and soon God was forgotten. Year after year, despite the love and care of God,
the nation slipped further and further from Him. By so doing, it was moving
closer and still closer to the point where God would be utterly rejected and
forced to lay down His control of the mighty powers of nature surrounding it,
thus leaving it to its fate. But an infinitely loving God would not do this
without firstly giving the king a clear warning of what was to happen. So He
sent Moses with the rod in his hand to demonstrate what was about to develop.
Moses stood in the presence of Pharaoh as God's
representative. He did what God told him to do thereby providing God with the
means whereby He could tell the king what was about to occur in Egypt.
The rod in Moses' hand was a symbol of the powers which God
had put into nature and into man. As Moses held and guided that staff, so God
held and controlled those powers. When the rod left the prophet's hand, it
changed into a serpent, the well-known symbol of Satan, the destroyer.
The first step was to call upon the haughty ruler to set
Israel free. This was a loving invitation to repentance and obedience. It was
uttered in the context of impending disaster which emphasized the need for such
steps to be urgently taken. Failure to avail himself of the offer made, would
open the floodgates of woe upon them until he would be deprived of the power to
further retain his slaves.
In order for the work of God to be successful in saving the
Egyptians and releasing His people, the king must be given very clear
revelations of what God would actually do. He had to be shown that the troubles
about to descend upon them were not God's handiwork, but were the inevitable and
unpreventable consequences of casting aside the law as a life- preserver. To
teach that to the king, the whole enacted parable of the rods and the serpents
was presented. Everything depended upon his being able to read the message
therein and then on his being willing to walk in harmony with it. Likewise
today, everything depends on our being able to see what God intended the king to
see and to walk in accord therewith.
The lesson is as clear as it is simple. Whilever the rod
remained in Moses' hand, it was never a death-dealing serpent. In order to
become a serpent, it had to pass out of his hands and out of his control. During
the whole time that it remained out of his hand and control, it continued to be
a serpent, but the moment he grasped it again, it was once more a rod.
The truth could not have been stated more clearly.
Unfortunately, the message was lost on the king but it need not be lost on you
and me today. What God desired to convey to the king was this:
"Pharaoh, mighty king of Egypt," said God, "up
until the present time, despite the increasing apostasy which has marked you and
your subjects, the rod of power has still been in My hand and under My control.
Because of this, the destroyer has not stalked through your land. You have
enjoyed wonderful prosperity and blessing. You have made the most of the
opportunity to become the most powerful nation on the earth. But daily you are
separating farther from Me, disobeying the very laws I gave you in love to
preserve you. You have forced the gap of separation to widen and deepen until I
retain only the most tenuous hold on the powers I gave you in nature and in
yourselves. I now plead with you to repent of your backsliding. As a
demonstration of your willingness now to obey Me, and abide by the laws that
guarantee your existence, let the Israelites go. I do not wish to see you
shattered and destroyed by the fearful suffering you are about to bring upon
yourself and your people. But, if you refuse to repent, this act will cut the
last faint, controlling grip I have on these powers. They will pass out of My
hands and when they do they will become elements of terrible destruction. But
know that even when they do, I can reach forth and take them again. The instant
that I do, they will cease to be destroyers and will again become a rod of
With what marvellous love and yearning God appealed to the
stubborn heart of the rebellious king. With what pride and disdain, the monarch
rejected the outreach of such unchangeable love. His response was to call in the
magicians of the realm, and have them cast down their rods. Seemingly, they
turned into serpents too, but instead of being a one to one situation, it was a
case of many versus one. To all appearances, the serpents of Pharaoh would
easily consume the serpent coming from the rod of Moses.
What was the monarch really saying in reply? He was declaring
that he had not the least need for God to hold those powers in control. He was
well able to live in full independence of God. Let Him release the rod. Let it
turn into a serpent of destruction. He had power at his command to more than
cope with the powers which God had released from His grasp.
This is still the attitude of man. When trouble seems to
engulf him, he turns to his own resources to contain it. If God is thought of at
all, it is only as a last resort and, as soon as the trouble passes, He is
forgotten. But men cannot manage the powers of God out of His control and
direction. When mighty hurricanes sweep in from the oceans, flooding the land,
and tearing buildings apart, there is absolutely nothing man can do to stop
them. They run their full course. So with earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, great
fires, and the like. Man cannot resist or contain them.
Neither could the serpents of Pharaoh handle Moses' serpent.
It busily ate up all Pharaoh's serpents, and still remained as vigorous and
undiminished as ever.
God could never have conveyed the message more clearly than
He did here, nor could the king have rejected it more fully.
The next day, with the rod, Moses indicated the place from
where the presence of God would first be withdrawn, so that the king could not
avoid knowing that what God had prophesied would happen, did happen, and that it
was not a mere coincidence.
During the falling of the plagues, God yearningly, and
lovingly, kept the door of mercy open. He was ever ready and willing to retake
control of the forces afflicting the Egyptians. But He could do this only if
they repented and gave the work back into His hands. Pharaoh, compelled to
recognize that neither he nor his magicians had any power to control those
elements of destruction, took advantage of the character of God. When the
terrible pressure was upon them, Pharaoh made great promises to God and pleaded
with Him through Moses to take the plague away. In response, God reached down
and took up the serpent by the tail, whereupon it immediately became a rod
again. As soon as the trouble passed, Pharaoh's confidence returned and he
forgot his promises to God.
Man is still the same. When bowed to the gates of death by
forces beyond his control, he will, in the terror of the moment, call upon God
for deliverance while making wonderful commitments to Him. Then, as soon as the
trouble is passed, he will forget all the promises and revert to his ways of
In 1846, a light steamer was carrying passengers from
Portland, Maine, to Boston, Massachusetts, in the U.S.A. A fierce storm whipped
the Atlantic into a fury, threatening the lives of the people on board. A
passenger described the scene as follows:
"We were in great peril. The boat rolled fearfully, and
the waves dashed into the cabin windows. There was great fear in the ladies'
cabin. Many were confessing their sins and crying on God for mercy. Some were
calling on the Virgin Mary to keep them, while others were making solemn vows to
God that if they reached land they would devote their lives to His service. It
was a scene of terror and confusion. Through the mercy of God we were all landed
safe. But some of the passengers who manifested much fear in the storm made no
reference to it, only to make light of their fears. One who had solemnly
promised that if she were preserved to see land she would be a Christian,
mockingly cried out as she left the boat: 'Glory to God, I am glad to step on
land again!' I asked her to go back a few hours, and remember her vows to God.
She turned from me with a sneer. I was forcibly reminded of a deathbed
repentance. Some serve themselves and Satan all their lives, and then as
sickness subdues them, and a fearful uncertainty is before them, they manifest
some sorrow for sin, and perhaps say they are willing to die, and their friends
make themselves believe that they have been truly converted and fitted for
heaven. But if these should recover, they would be as rebellious as ever."
So it was with that powerful Egyptian potentate. When the
pressure was upon him, he appeared to repent, but when it was lifted, he
showed that there had been no genuine putting away of sin. Each such
prevarication had an adverse effect on his mind and character, significantly
hardening his heart and thus making him less and less capable of surrendering to
God. This, in turn, separated God from control of the forces surrounding the
nation, with the result that a fresh plague burst upon them. Finally, with the
tenth scourge, when the first-born lay dead, the king was so broken, and his
land so shattered, that he had no further power to hold the Israelites.
But not one of those afflictions befell them because God had
control of the chastising elements. It was only when the control had passed out
of His hands, that they could and did come.
This is completely opposite from the ways of the criminal
kings of Chicago. Only when the weapons of destruction are in their hands and
under their control, do their victims experience pain and suffering. On the
other hand, when the forces are in God's hand and under His control, they can
never be destroyers.
In the light of the abundant evidence revealing what God
really did in Egypt, it is surprising how badly men have misread the records of
the event. God took great care through the parable of the rods and serpents, to
declare just what He would do in Egypt. God is not a liar. What He said He
would do is what He did.
He has also made it plain that He does not work as man works.
Man uses force to achieve his ends, but God does not.
To confirm beyond doubt the veracity of these Old Testament
witnesses, Christ came to give a personal declaration and demonstration of His
Father's character and methods. His persecutors related to Him exactly as
Pharaoh did to God, and Christ responded precisely as His Father had done.
They reviled Him, taunted Him, scourged Him, spat on Him,
loaded a cruel 'cross on His back and hung Him upon it. Yet there is no trace of
any spirit of retaliation. Christ did not reach out to grasp the weapons of
power to control and direct them in withering destruction upon His foes as He
easily might have done. His only response was to cry out with unutterable love
and pity, "Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do." Luke
Why Not Before
To believe that God forcibly subdued the Egyptians in
order to effect the release of His people, is to level, by implication, a
terrible indictment against the Lord. It is to charge Him with deliberately and
callously leaving the Jews to suffer for centuries when they could have been
released long before they were.
He who in the possession of omnipotent power, uses it as the
means of executing his will, can do what he wishes when he chooses. If
this is God's way as so many suppose, then every day that the Israelites
continued in servitude, was because He chose not to release them. For
centuries, they were ground down in brutal bondage, all the misery of which
would have to be accounted to God for failing to exert His mighty power at any
chosen time to set them free. God could not be a God of love and at the same
time behave in this fashion.
The truth is, God has committed Himself never to solve
problems by the use of force. Therefore, the timing for the Israelites' release
would be determined, not by God's own personal choice, but by the effects of the
Egyptians' deepening apostasy. This brought about a separation from God which
released destructive powers upon them until they had destroyed their capacity to
hold their slaves. Then and only then, could the Israelites go free. When these
principles are understood, no problem will be seen in the fact that the
Israelites were left in servitude for so long.
God will not deviate from His ways for He knows that the use
of force is self-defeating. Had it been His principle to rule by force, then He
would have stamped rebellion out of existence as soon as it manifested itself
initially. There would have been no long period of sin in this world.
But sin must be allowed to run its course until it ultimately
destroys itself and all who cling to it. Then the Lord will be free to make the
new heavens and the new earth with no danger of their defilement.
Cleansing the Temple
Early in His ministry, Christ cleansed the temple of the
buyers and sellers. The story is told in John 2:13-22. His soul was
stirred to the depths by what He saw, and after ". . . He had made a
scourge of small cords, He drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and
the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables."
This story can be as easily misinterpreted as the story of
the plagues on Egypt, and mostly is. Without question, the simple explanation is
accepted that Christ actually threatened to whip those men and would have done
so if they had not obeyed Him.
But had He done so, then what difference would there have
been between His behaviour and that of the lords of gangland? Wherein could He
claim that His ways and man's are different?
These questions demand that another look be taken at this
incident to see what really happened. This is the New Testament counterpart of
the Old Testament story studied above. What God did to Pharaoh, Christ did to
the money-changers. It is another dramatization of God's holding and controlling
of power. The setting and the actions are slightly different, but the message is
The most significant difference lay in the fact that while
Moses allowed the rod to pass out of his hands and control, Christ did not lose
either His grip or His control over the scourge.
The events which transpired in each of these times was
exactly consistent with the actions of Moses and Christ. Egypt suffered
immediate calamities as Moses, by releasing the rod, indicated they
would. Christ in the temple however, assured them that there was yet time to
repent, for He still retained control over the scourge. Thus, no great disasters
overtook them during His earthly sojourn. Christ's action was also a warning of
the danger that their unheeding apostasy would compel Him to release His grip.
Should this happen, then the experience of the Egyptians would also be theirs.
It is a matter of history that they refused to repent. They turned their backs
utterly and defiantly upon God, and the rod did become a serpent as is evidenced
by the devastation and slaughter in Jerusalem in A.D. 70.
There was no possibility of Christ's striking them with the
scourge. That was not His purpose in raising it up. It hung threateningly over
them, but, while in Christ's hands, it never touched them. The important thing
was for the Jews to keep it there where it could never hurt nor destroy them.
Thus, when a careful comparison is made between the actions
of God in Egypt and those of Christ in the temple, it is clear that Christ spoke
the truth when He said that He did everything the Father did, exactly as He did
The Testimony of the Cross
The cross is the complete revelation of both God and Satan
and their respective principles of operation. The nature of the struggle waged
at the sacrificial tree permitted nothing short of total commitment by both
parties. Nothing could be, or was, held in reserve.
The disguise worn by Satan to conceal his real identity was
stripped away, as was the mask he had placed on the name and character of God to
misrepresent Him before the universe. From that titanic struggle, the evil one
emerged to be seen for what he really was-a being who is so utterly devoted to
the service of self, that he would even sacrifice the life of the One who had
made him and who had given him all he had. He exhibited the spirit which he had
already put into, and manifested through, the criminal kings of the earth. The
way he treated Christ is his example of how he will treat all who do not serve
How deeply grateful we can be that this is not the character
of God. Well might we shiver with terror if it was. God and Christ are motivated
by another principle altogether-that of self-sacrificing, loving service. They
will serve all others no matter what the sacrifice might be to Themselves. They
do not make an example of those who do not obey Them. Instead They make an
example of Themselves showing that, far from demanding and taking people's
lives, They give Their own.
Christ's garment is indeed dipped in blood-His own. Satan
also has a garment dipped in blood-the blood of others. How totally
opposite the two are. When a careful comparison is made between the ways of men
and of Satan, it is found that they are identical, but nothing of those
principles and procedures can be found in the life of Christ or His Father,
except as they have been wrongfully accused.
More than this, the way in which Christ died is absolute
proof that God does not destroy the sinner. In the Garden of Eden, man elected
to go his own way. He disobeyed the law of love, thus casting aside his
life-preserver and exposing himself to the fatal results of broken law. The very
day he did this, he would have died as God said he would, but for one thing. The
instant man transgressed, Christ stepped in between the living and the dead and
said: Let the punishment fall on Me.
So that He might receive and bear on our behalf, the
punishment which would otherwise have obliterated every one of us, He came to
this earth. This is the critical point. Christ did not come to
bear any punishment, but only the one which man had incurred. It must be
completely self-evident that if Christ came short by even a hair's breadth of
bearing our punishment, then we could not be saved. The penalty must be fully
There are two concepts being taught of the way in which the
impenitent meets his doom. The common one is that a patience-exhausted God uses
His omnipotent power to cleanse the universe of the disobedient. In this
teaching, the actual death stroke is administered by God.
If this is true, then this is the way Christ had
to perish for He had to die our death. If our death is execution at the hands of
God, then the Father had to execute His Son.
The other concept is that the sinner separates himself from God.
Consequently, God is not able to maintain proper control of the forces both in
the sinner and around him with the result that he is destroyed by his own
If this is true, then this is the way in which
Christ had to die.
From this it is evident that the way in which Christ died is clear
proof of the way the unrepentant sinner will perish. Fortunately, there is no
mystery surrounding the death of Christ. It happened in full public view, and I
have yet to meet the person who would teach that the Father came down to the
cross and personally executed His dearly beloved, only-begotten Son. It did not
happen that way.
Christ Himself gives testimony to what happened. In His final
moments, He cried out, "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" Matthew
27:46. Here is no witness that God was drawing near with slaughter weapons
in His hands! instead He was departing from Christ just as He departs
from every unrepentant sinner. Christ Himself was no sinner, yet having accepted
the weight of the sins of the world, He stood in the place of every
transgressor. So truly did He take those iniquities that it was as if He had
committed every one Himself. It was that weight of woe which was separating Him
from His Father. Separated from God, totally at the mercy of the destroyer, sin,
In exactly the same way died the Egyptians, the Sodomites,
the antediluvians and every other person who has suffered the death penalty. So
will sin, at the end of the millennium, obliterate those who refuse the offer of
deliverance from its power.
Higher, Holier Concepts
God is love. His character, His law, is love. Every act of
creation, every plan made, and every step taken in the work of redemption, is an
expression of that incomprehensible attribute which pervades every aspect and
element of God and His behaviour.
God's ways are unchangeable, His principles immutable. The
better they are understood, the more warmly and deeply are they appreciated.
That love, perceived and received, will flood the soul with light and beauty.
Responses will be generated which will harmonize with the thoughts of the
Eternal One. The recipient will be initiated into the glowing circle of life and
beauty which everlastingly emanates from the throne of the Omnipotent, as a
living channel through which this glowing stream will reach out to others and
through them to still more. With what wonder and delight will the redeemed enter
into the joy of their Lord To thus dwell in the light which floods forth from
the Eternal, is happiness without equal, joy beyond comparison.
Do not imagine that none of this is to be until the return of
Christ and the establishment of the eternal kingdom of joy and bliss. For the
true child of God, heaven has already begun. The love of God dwells in his heart
and the character of God is expressed through his life. Day by day he is
learning to think and speak of God as Christ, the One who knew Him best, thought
and spoke of Him.
It is a tragedy of immeasurable proportions, that, since the
fall, human minds have been darkened by the most serious misconceptions of the
character of their loving heavenly Father. This is the direct cause of the
multiplied sorrows and sufferings which have overtaken the earthly family. The
tendency is for children to copy the behaviour of their parents. So when God is
seen, even though mistakenly, as a being who uses the power at His disposal to
enforce obedience and worship, then men emulate the example, by oppressing their
fellow-men. This produces counter-measures to resist and overcome these
pressures. Inevitably this leads to wars, terrorism, murders, and a thousand
other woes. Obsessed with the protection of their own life and property and the
achievement of their ambitions, men will pursue these objectives irrespective of
what cost may be exacted from others.
But if they would cease to think as men, to understand
instead the true character of God, then they would be motivated to emulate that.
The chief concern would then be, not to serve self but to serve others no matter
what the cost to themselves. If this was the spirit filling and motivating every
individual as it did Christ, there would never be a war, murder, oppression, or
any such thing.
The time has come to think no more as a man but as Christ,
who showed us the Father as He really is. When the vision of God as
brought by Christ is truly and fully seen, then will be opened to all who see
it, the treasures of salvation and redemption. The hearts of all will be made
"This is life eternal,
that they might know Thee the only true God,
and Jesus Christ,
whom Thou hast sent." John